This is an interesting blog from Will Saville co-founder of
Brightstarr. Take a look at the 3things you should know before
using SharePoint to build your website.
If you are thinking about using SharePoint for Web Content
Management (WCM) or Customer Experience Management (CXM) here are
my three top points to consider to ensure your project is a
success:
Starting any Microsoft SharePoint project can be a daunting
task, especially when it's the corporate website - it is generally
a very high profile project. If you are thinking about using
SharePoint for Web Content Management (WCM) or Customer Experience
Management (CXM) here are my three top points to consider to ensure
your project is a success:
Eighty twenty rule:
When I talk to clients about their new SharePoint website
I often hear the question "can SharePoint do that?" and quite
frankly, it makes me cringe. When I hear this kind of question so
early on in a project, it usually means there is a danger of the
'tail wagging the dog' unless dealt with swiftly. Website projects
should be about generating revenues, raising product and service
awareness, connecting with customers and elevating brands. Not
about how you can fit a website around SharePoint (or any WCM
platform for that matter). I'm not suggesting you completely
disregard the technology - after all, the business has made an
investment in the platform and therefore needs the ROI - but there
is a healthy balance between technology and delivering a digital
experience that meets the business objectives. As a rule of thumb
when going through the initial requirements stage of a SharePoint
website project, I talk about the business requirements and
business value 80% of the time, and SharePoint / technology only
20% of the time.
Out of the box won't do:
SharePoint can be deployed out-of-the-box in many
scenarios; whether for document management, light project
management or a basic intranet. But, not for your public facing
website. Face up to the fact from the beginning that you're going
to need to do some customisation work. A good example of this is
out-of-the-box webpart's; I've lost count of the times where people
think they are going to be able to use all of the out of the box
webpart's on their shiny new website and are disappointed when they
realise it's simply not going to work.
Out-of-the-box webpart's are not suitable for web. As cynical as
that may sound, it is true. Out-of-the-box webpart's were
originally designed and developed for behind the firewall
applications, are generally not optimised for front-end performance
and don't give the fine control over look, feel and interaction
that is required for a public facing website. It's also often the
case that Content Managers want to manage most of their content on
the page template level rather than on the page level where webpart
are typically used.
The biggest challenge to heavily customising SharePoint for your
website is the financial one, especially in the current economic
climate. The key factor here is that the website will use the core
platform services that SharePoint provides, including the
publishing infrastructure, providing all the foundations and hooks
upon which a website can be built. The publishing infrastructure
itself provides all the core features required in an enterprise
content management platform - including version control and history
content approval, page templates WYSIWYG editors and reusable
content.
Content is king:
If content is king, then Content Managers must be pretty
important. But, it's incredible how easily they can be side-lined.
A poor editing and content management experience will lead to low
user adoption, which will ultimately result in content not being
published as quickly (if at all). Because SharePoint isn't a point
WCM solution, it's really important to consider their needs and
make sure it works from a content management perspective as early
on as possible. Practically this means; making sure pages are
actually editable in edit mode, that content can be managed through
taxonomy and tagging and that Content Managers and Editors have a
central place where they can go to complete all the tasks they are
required to keep the content relevant and fresh. In my experience,
there is no substitute in getting Content Managers engaged with the
website project as early on as possible and keeping them involved
throughout the entire project. This will not only ensure that their
requirements are catered for, but will also build a sense of
ownership around the project from an early stage which typically
results in a high user adoption going forward.
Summary:
It's important for anyone about to embark on a SharePoint
WCM project that they are not going to be able to switch SharePoint
on and build highly engaging websites out-of-the-box. But, this is
true of practically all WCM platforms. In my view, the success of
most web projects ultimately comes down to the people working on
them and their drive, innovation and enthusiasm, rather than the
underlying technology.
Why not keep up to date with the
latest SharePoint content by joining our community or by
following us on twitter or facebook!